Senator outraged over pro-life pamphlets: Fliers depicted aborted fetuses, bloody hands

By Jenika Chiang | February 6th, 2017

As a senator for the College of Liberal Arts and the chair of the Health & Safety Committee, Samantha Bivins’ personal philosophy of life is to improve any situation she comes across, and to politically advocate for mental health issues in the United States.

When a few individuals who attended the Involvement Fair expressed concern to Bivins regarding controversial images displayed on materials provided by UNLV pro-life group Students for Life (SFL), she knew it was her duty to inform the senate.

During a Jan. 30 CSUN meeting, Bivins addressed her fellow senators during public comment about the organization, which received approval for funding at the previous Jan. 23 meeting.

She explained to them that UNLV SFL distributed materials that displayed images contrary to what they stated in their proposal.

As a pro-life organization, UNLV SFL aims to inform students about abortion and aid pregnant women who face unplanned pregnancies on campus.

A funding proposal letter written by UNLV SFL representative Clare Finley states that the organization “recognizes the sensitivity of and broad ranging spectrum of belief on the topic of abortion.”

However, the organization had a booth at the Involvement Fair where they provided students with pamphlets, brochures and flyers displaying images that Bivins described to be “of violent nature.” They showed images of ultrasounds with faces of fetuses and the small, bloody hands of aborted fetuses, according to Bivins.

Bivins recalled that during their presentation, she specifically asked the organization if they would be displaying explicit images that could possibly elicit a traumatic experience for individuals on campus.

“They point-blank said, ‘no,’” Bivins said.

But in the eyes of Mikaela Clark, a representative from UNLV SFL, the photos simply depict the stages of fetal development.

“I don’t see what is offensive about the development of a human being. It is basic biology of human life,” Clark said.

Clark believes that as college students, abortion should be openly discussed.

“If people think pictures of fetuses is offensive or controversial, that is unfortunate,” Clark said.

Bivins made it clear that she made public comment to the senate not because the organization is pro-life, but because the organization displayed images contrary to what they described on public record to the senate.

“My problem with this had nothing to do with the fact that they were handing out anti-abortion pamphlets. That’s their right,” Bivins said. “But if you have lied to the senate before on public record, why would we fund you to go traumatize people campus? How are we supporting the students by doing that?”

She expressed genuine concern for the students who may have been provoked by the images and urged the senate to think twice if the organization requests funding again in the future.

Speaking as a representative of the senate, Bivins iterated multiple times that CSUN’s stance on student funding is not to be partisan in any type of way. She believes that all organizations, including UNLV SFL, have a right to advocate for their purpose or cause.

“CSUN does not have any political affiliation whatsoever on a Democratic, Republican, Libertarian or any party side at all. Our job is not to dictate to student organizations what they are allowed to advocate for or against,” Bivins said. “Our job is to give student money to student organizations to fund what their purpose is and what their cause is.”

At the time of their original presentation to CSUN, SFL requested $3,050 for various costs needed to transport large pieces of art to an event out-of-state. The money—as stated in their funding request—was said to cover travel expenses, event expenses and more, for 12 staff members.

But the funding provided by CSUN is no longer available since the organization will not be attending the out-of-state event they originally planned to go to, according to Bivins.

“I just want to urge you all that if this organization does come up for funding to us again, I think we should keep in mind that they came here asking for money and they lied,” Bivins said to the senate.

Editor’s Note: Bianca Cseke, the editor-in-chief of the UNLV Scarlet & Gray Free Press, and Samantha Bivins, the CSUN senator who appears in this story, participate in the same student organization. Cseke did not participate in reporting or editing this story.


Tags assigned to this article:
Outragestudent governmentStudents for Life

Related Articles

UNLV alumna kicks off new clothing line

The days are long but the work is rewarding. Finally, after two years of dreaming, researching, self-teaching, planning strategically and

IN BRIEF

Barrick aids Great Basin campus Barrick Gold of North America pledged a $1.2 million donation over three years to the

Employers come calling

Biannual career fair brings 111 participants to Thomas and Mack

5 comments

Write a comment
  1. Samantha Bivins
    Samantha Bivins 8 February, 2017, 09:21

    Clearly you did not read the article. All student organizations, including those which represent anti-abortion are entitled to funding. There is no room for personal opinion regarding the mission or goals of a registered student organization in CSUN Student Government. Neither CSUN or The Scarlet & Gray Free Press is trying to silence anyone. It is a fact that graphic images were displayed and it is a fact that during Students For Life’s presentation to the Senate they were dishonest about the nature of the images that their organization promotes. No students came to me complaining about the ultrasound photos they saw, they came to me because of images featuring aborted fetuses. You are trying to incite a reaction using emotion, rather than logic and reason. In accordance with Nevada Open Meeting Law, CSUN is required to audio record all meetings and we also have digital copies as well. Additionally, there are emails back and forth from Students For Life and the Ways & Means Committee, which funds registered student organizations. It is a system created to maintain accountability. It’s difficult to allege acts of impropriety and make false claims about being silenced when transparency is in place.

    We live in a society where the rights of ALL must be considered and respected.

    Reply this comment
  2. Meg
    Meg 7 February, 2017, 16:34

    Thank you UNLV Students for Life for being a voice for the voiceless! While the paper and student government is trying to cyber bully you in to silencemail by publishing lies about your club.

    Reply this comment
  3. Samantha Bivins
    Samantha Bivins 7 February, 2017, 07:36

    First I would like to commend The Scarlet and Gray Free Press for reporting on this important topic. I feel that the article was well written and is an accurate representation of the in person interview I had with Jenika. Secondly, I am a mother to four children so I’m very familiar with what fetal development looks like. While the images contained in this article do indeed show stages of fetal development, it should be noted that the images which I expressed concern over were of a very graphic nature and featured aborted fetuses. While some may not be affected by these photos, these images have the ability to trigger a traumatic response for certain individuals. I remain committed to promoting the mental well being of all students on campus, so I won’t elaborate further on the nature of the photos, but should anyone be interested in speaking to me and/or viewing the materials, you can email me at samantha.bivins@unlv.edu.

    Respectfully,
    Senator Samantha Bivins

    Reply this comment
    • Meg
      Meg 7 February, 2017, 16:36

      First I would like to commend UNLV Students for Life for being a voice for the voiceless while this paper and the student government try to silence your message with threats.

      Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published.
Required fields are marked*